Caught on camera –top tips on monitoring staff

Article Index
Overview


The award of £15,920 against Michele Mone’s lingerie firm MJM International for ‘bugging’ an employee raises questions about how far employers can go to check on their workforce using covert cameras and listening devices. 

Director Scott Kilday walked out of his £55,000 operations director role and filed for unfair dismissal after discovering a plant pot in his office had been bugged. An employment tribunal held that MJM’s decision to plant the listening device was ‘likely to destroy or seriously damage the degree of trust and confidence an employee is entitled to have in his employer’ and Mr Kilday could ‘not be expected to put up with it’.

MJM claimed they were concerned that Mr Kilday was planning to leave and work with Ms Mone’s ex-husband. However, employment judge Shona MacLean stated that the lingerie giant could have ‘legitimately taken steps’ to ‘protect its business interests’ if it had concerns about Mr Kilday. 

This case highlights the dangers that employers can face when monitoring staff, particularly as developments in digital technology mean that it has never been easier to snoop on employees in public and in the workplace. It is estimated that there are around 1.74 million CCTV cameras in the UK and many companies monitor their staff’s use of the internet and social media. 

But just how far can HR managers and employers go to keep tabs on their staff if they suspect them of fraudulent activity? And what steps can be taken to ensure that surveillance does not fall foul of the law? 

What are the criteria for monitoring staff within the law?

Employers can monitor employees through a variety of means and for a number of reasons; for instance they may want to deploy covert methods to check on a member of staff who they believe is on sick leave but is not genuinely ill – and may even be running another business. Or there may be suspicion that an employee is defrauding the company, or involved in an illegal activity. 

Before approving covert monitoring, employers should ask themselves:

  • Is this an exceptional circumstance and is there a reason to suspect criminal activity or malpractice?
  • Will the cameras be used for a specific investigation and will they be removed once it has been completed?
  • Would it prejudice the investigation to tell workers that cameras are being used?
  • Have you taken into account the intrusion on innocent workers?
  • Has the decision been taken by senior management? 

Is it always appropriate to record what staff are doing?

In some cases, it is but in others it isn’t. For instance, if there is a suspicion that items are being stolen from a store room, then it would be acceptable to install CCTV as it will not involve continuous or intrusive monitoring. Also, it is reasonable to keep an eye on what it going on. 

However, if an employer suspects that employees are making mobile phone calls during working hours, against company policy, and is planning to install CCTV to monitor them throughout the day, this would be regarded as intrusive and unacceptable. 

Continuous monitoring should only be used in very exceptional circumstances, for instance where hazardous substances are used or failure to follow procedures could pose a serious risk to life. 

Do employees need to be told they are being monitored? 

Staff should normally be made aware that they are being monitored but depending on the circumstances, covert recording of staff can be justified if it is part of a specific investigation. 

While it might seem obvious to say it, cameras and listening devices should never be installed in areas such as toilets and private offices.

What have tribunals said about covert monitoring?

The EAT decision in City and County of Swansea v Gayle provided some comfort to employers who might have previously been fearful of covertly monitoring employees for fear of breaching European Law. 

The case involved a member of staff playing squash when he should have been working. A private investigator hired by the council filmed him leaving his local sports centre on five separate occasions when he was supposed to be in work. The employee was sacked for gross misconduct and took his case to an employment tribunal, which originally found in his favour. It ruled that the use of covert surveillance infringed his rights to a private life under art. 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. However, the EAT ruled that the employee lost his right to privacy because he was publicly defrauding his employer by playing squash in work time.

Scottish Water was also exonerated for videoing an employee coming and going from his home to prove that he had been falsifying his time sheets. Again, the employee forfeited his right to privacy because he was effectively involved in criminal activity. See McGowan v Scottish Water.

Is monitoring the best way of checking on employees?

Employers should approach this kind of monitoring with caution and only use it if they can’t find evidence of wrongdoing through more transparent ways of investigation. Targeted and secret monitoring of an employee can only be justified if an employer has sufficient grounds to suspect criminal activity, serious malpractice or breach of company policies. The surveillance needs to be proportionate to the fraudulent activity in which the employee is allegedly engaged.

The whole area of what - and who - can monitor is complex and the wrong decision could leave employers exposed in an employment tribunal. Use covert surveillance as the last resort and make sure that you take the right HR and legal advice. 


 

Comments 

 
# Biometric Attendance 2017-02-20 12:57
E-Sync Security Solutions is leading commercial and Non-Commercial Security Equipment installation and Maintenance Company. It is Located in Chennai, Tamilnadu. Our Service Category 1.Surveillance Security Systems, 2. Office Security and Maintenance equipments, 3. Commercial Building Security Systems, 4. Induatrial Security and Automation Systems.
Reply
 
 
# Leserunty 2019-04-10 02:16
Purchasing Legally On Line Amoxicilina Website In Internet Discount Fluoxetine Price Shop Elocon precio cialis generico 20 mg Cephalexin Cap 500mg Ordinare Viagra Line Comprar Cialis Con Paypal
Reply
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh





Forgotten your password?

 
I'd like to subscribe
Subscribers only - te law will answer your employment law queries. Find out more about our email support

Now there's more ways to stay in touch

Join Us on Linked in Become our Fan on Facebook Follow us on Twitter