The employer’s failure to consult the employee about a medical report before deciding to dismiss him was discriminatory under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and it also made the dismissal unfair.
Importance of consulting the employee
The employer’s failure to consult the employee about a medical report before deciding to dismiss him was discriminatory under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and it also made the dismissal unfair.
Rothwell v Pelikan Hardcopy Scotland Ltd
Award of Disability Living Allowance not determinative of being ‘disabled’
In many instances someone who is receiving Disability Living Allowance or, for that matter, other incapacity-related benefits, might also fall within the definition of a ‘disabled’ person under the Disability Discrimination Act – but not always.
Hill v Clacton Family Trust Ltd
Disability discrimination by association
C, a legal secretary for a firm of solicitors, claimed direct disability discrimination and harassment on the grounds of the disablity of her son, for whom she is the primary carer. C herself is not disabled.
EBR Attridge Law v Coleman
Correct comparator for DDA purposes
This House of Lords decision, although not an employment case (it concerned housing), is significant for disability discrimination law because the provisions it considered are identical to the employment provisions in the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA). M, a schizophrenic, was evicted when he unlawfully sublet his flat. He claimed this related to his disability and was unlawful.
London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm
|
|
|
| Page 5 of 5 |
Subscribers only - te law will answer your employment law queries.
Find out more about our email support