Weddall v Barchester Healthcare Ltd; Wallbank v Wallbank Fox Designs Ltd

Employer’s liability for employee’s violence
Article Index
Overview
The Court of Appeal stresses that whether an employer will be vicariously liable for one employee’s violent actions towards another employee depends on whether there is a sufficiently close connection between what the employee is actually required to do and the violent action. Only if such violence can truly be said to be ‘in the course of employment’ will an employer be liable.
...
 
The full version of this article is available to subscribers only. To read the full article you must sign in.
Or Subscribe
Find out more about subscription