Up first
Employer’s liability for employee’s violence
The Court of Appeal stresses that whether an employer will be vicariously liable for one employee’s violent actions towards another employee depends on whether there is a sufficiently close connection between what the employee is actually required to do and the violent action. Only if such violence can truly be said to be ‘in the course of employment’ will an employer be liable.
Weddall v Barchester Healthcare Ltd; Wallbank v Wallbank Fox Designs Ltd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Page 1 of 14 |
Subscribers only - the employment team at Seddons answer your employment law queries.
Find out more about our email support
Sickness Absence Review - it’s the economy stupid
Economic pressures, changes to employment law, and pensions auto-enrolment all present major challenges to HR professionals in 2012. As a result, you could be forgiven for overlooking the Sickness Absence Review (SAR), which was published by the Department of Work and Pensions in November 2011. Which is a bit of a shame, as this report could well be the first small step in tackling what is a huge problem for the government, employers and staff.
...
-
Tuesday, 24 January 2012
‘Previous experience’ is a poor indicator of graduate quality
-
Thursday, 12 January 2012
‘Hintrapreneurs’ should be seeking support not permission
-
Friday, 30 December 2011
IT holds the key to human capital management













