Gibb v Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust

Save to account Send as an E-mail Open as PDF Print Friendly Version

NHS compromise agreement for £250K was not unreasonable

Article Index
Overview

The Court of Appeal has overturned a High Court decision that a £250,000 compromise agreement between an NHS Trust and its former Chief Executive was unreasonably generous. The CEO’s good service and likely difficulties in finding future employment were relevant considerations and the High Court had been wrong to disregard them. The Court of Appeal also made some pretty scathing comments about the way that the case had been handled.
...

The full version of this article is available to subscribers only. To read the full article you must sign in.
Or

Find out more about subscription

Subscribers only - te law will answer your employment law queries. Find out more about our email support

Case Digests

Free Download the latest HRBullets newsletter

Now there's more ways to stay in touch

Home
Case Digests
Compromise agreements
NHS compromise agreement for £250K was not unreasonable

General

Our Service

Other Information

All rights reserved. No reproduction, distribution or transmission of any information, part or parts of this website by any means whatsoever is permitted without the prior written permission of Gordon Publishing Ltd | Designed & Maintained by Boxhedge New Media Design

Gibb v Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust

Case Digests

Compromise agreements and legal indemnities

Compromise agreements and the scope of ‘independent legal advice’

NHS compromise agreement for £250K was not unreasonable

Catch-all provision in compromise agreement did not prevent further claim

Repayment clause in settlement agreement was a penalty and unenforceable

Compromise agreement did not exclude race discrimination claims

Equal pay claim was not compromised

Clear language needed in COT3 form

Now there's more ways to stay in touch

General

Our Service

Other Information